NEW REPORT REVEALS WIDESPREAD DECLINE IN WORLD'S ECOSYSTEMS


News Release issued jointly by the United Nations Environment Programme,
United Nations Development Programme, the World Bank and the World Resources
Institute


NAIROBI, April 18, 2000 --- Summary findings of a new report issued
yesterday in Washington D.C. reveal a widespread decline in the condition of
the world's ecosystems due to increasing resource demands and warn that if
the decline continues it could have devastating implications for human
development and the welfare of all species.

"Many signs point to the declining capacity of ecosystems," says the Guide
to the World Resources 2000-2001: People and Ecosystems: The Fraying Web of
Life. The full report, to be released in September, is published by the
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), the UN Environment Programme
(UNEP), the World Bank and the World Resources Institute (WRI). Over 175
scientists contributed to the report, which took more than two years to
produce.

Ecosystems are communities of interacting organisms and the physical
environment in which they live; they are the biological engines of the
planet. At the heart of the report is the first-of-its- kind Pilot Analysis
of Global Ecosystems (PAGE). The report examines coastal, forest, grassland,
freshwater and agricultural ecosystems.

It analyzes their health on the basis of their ability to produce the goods
and services that the world currently relies on. These include production of
food, provision of pure and sufficient water, storage of atmospheric carbon,
maintenance of biodiversity and provision of recreation and tourism
opportunities.

The scorecards that accompany the World Resources 2000- 2001 describe most
of the ecosystems in fair, but declining conditions. The statistics it
contains are staggering:

* Half of the world's wetlands were lost last century.

* Logging and conversion have shrunk the world's forests by as much as half.

* Some 9 percent of the world's tree species are at risk of extinction;
tropical deforestation may exceed 130,000 square kilometers per year.

* Fishing fleets are 40 percent larger than the ocean can sustain.

* Nearly 70 percent of the world's major marine fish stocks are overfished
or are being fished at their biological limit.

* Soil degradation has affected two-thirds of the world's agricultural lands
in the last 50 years.

* Some 30 percent of the world's original forests have been converted to
agriculture.

* Since 1980, the global economy has tripled in size and population has
grown by 30 percent to 6 billion people.

* Dams, diversions or canals fragment almost 60 percent of the world's
largest rivers.

* Twenty percent of the world's freshwater fish are extinct, threatened or
endangered.

"For too long in both rich and poor nations, development priorities have
focused on how much humanity can take from our ecosystems, with little
attention to the impact of our actions, " said Mark Malloch Brown, UNDP
administrator. "With this report, we reconfirm our commitment to making the
viability of the world's ecosystems a critical development priority for the
21st century."

However, World Resources 2000-2001 warns that halting the decline of the
planet's life-support systems may be the most difficult challenge humanity
has ever faced.

"Our knowledge of ecosystems has increased dramatically, but it has simply
not kept pace with our ability to alter them," said Klaus Toepfer, UNEP
executive director. "We can continue blindly altering Earth's ecosystems, or
we can learn to use them more sustainably."

World Resources 2000-2001 recommends that governments and people must view
the sustainability of ecosystems as essential to human life. It calls for an
ecosystems approach to managing the world's critical resources, which means
evaluating decisions on land and resource use in light of how they affect
the capacity of ecosystems to produce goods and services.

"Governments and businesses must rethink some basic assumptions about how we
measure and plan economic growth," said James D. Wolfensohn, World Bank
president. "The poor, who often depend directly on ecosystems for their
livelihoods, suffer most when ecosystems are degraded."

According to World Resources 2000-2001, one of the most important
conclusions of PAGE is that there is a lack of much of the baseline
knowledge that is needed to properly determine ecosystems conditions on a
global, regional or even local scale.

"The dimensions of this information gap are large and growing, rather than
shrinking as we would expect in this age of satellite imaging and the
Internet," said Jonathan Lash, WRI president. "If we are to make sound
ecosystem management decisions in the 21st century, dramatic changes are
needed in the way we use the knowledge and experience at hand and the range
of additional information we need."

The PAGE report has provided the impetus for the Millennium Ecosystems
Assessment - a plan put forward by governments, UN agencies, and leading
scientific organizations to allow an on-going monitoring and evaluation of
the health of the world's ecosystems.

Copies of A Guide to World Resources 2000-2001: People and Ecosystems: The
Fraying Web of Life can be downloaded at <http://www.wri.org/wri/wrr2000>;.
The full report will be available in September.

For more information, contact:

Adlai Amor, Media Director, WRI at (202) 729 7736
Email: 

Donna Wise, VP for Communications, WRI at (202) 729 7735
Email: 

Sid Kane, Media Officer, UNDP, at (212) 906 5324 Email:


Jim Sniffen, Information Officer, UNEP at (212) 963 8094 Email:


Kristyn Ebro, Public Affairs Officer, World Bank, at (202) 458 2736
Email: 


UNEP News Release 2000/47


---------

> From: Laszlo Pinter >
> Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 12:29:53 -0500
> To: "Michael Keating (E-mail)" >
> Subject: geoconnections
> 
> Michael,
> 
> You may be inetrested in this.
> 
> L.
> 
> <http://www.geoconnections.org/english/index.html>;
> 
> Laszlo Pinter
> Project Manager
> International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD)
> 161 Portage Avenue East
> Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 0Y4 Canada
> Tel: (204) 958-7715
> Fax: (204) 958-7710
> Email: 
> http://iisd.ca
> 
> Admin assistant: Valentina Kaltchev >
>

Kedves John,

Az Al Gore vedelmeben felsorolt erveid melle adatennem azt az 1993-ban hozzam 
irott levelet, melyben kiall a Duna es a Szigetkoz vedelmeben. Bizony, ha 
elnok lesz belole, ugy a magyar kormanynak nagy szovetsegese lehet a Duna 
visszaterelese es a Kiegyezesi Terv (KT) megvalositasaban. Ha a KT-t nem 
ismerned, ajanlom latogassad meg a kovetkezo honlapot:

   http://hometown.aol.com/dunahirek/myhomepage/business.html 

Koszont, Liptak Bela

... a szep, dicsero szavakert, buszke is vagyok ra. Csak egy apro 
baj van.

>Gacs Ivan,szamitasai tisztan
>mutatjak amit elobbiekben en irtam. Ami az hogy sok egyetemi magaspolcokon
>ulo PhD-k,akiknek vannak elozo kivallo kepzettsegei,de sajnos az elet
>valosagaitol tul messze ulnek.S amikor a kormanyszervektol nyilt kezzel
>kapjak az adifizetok kemeny munkaival elert penzuket,nem csoda hogy barmi
>valosagtol messze eso dolgokat terjesztenek. 

Ha jol ertem, akkor en most szembe lettem allitva a 
magaspolcosokkal. Ezutan toredelmesen be kell vallanom, egyetemi 
polcon ulok (a magassagat nem tudom megitelni, mert tul kozelrol 
latom) a PhD oklevelem tetejen. Nos, ennyit az altalanositasokrol.

Johnny!
Ha ezek utan meg szobaalsz velem, aruld mar el, hol vannak azok a 
kormanyszervek, amelyek nyitott kezzel szorjak, en is odaallnek. 
Tapasztalatom szerint aaz egyetemi szfera sehol a vilagon nem 
duskal. Persze, Te, mint professszor (megha a demokraciae is), ezt 
nyilvan ugyanigy latod. 

Na, most, hogy ezen is tul vagyunk, egy kis szakmai resz is, nehogy 
megrovast kapjak.

>Ne felejtsuk,hogy a technilogiai megoldas
>a CO es CO2 problemainak ,a carbon elvalasztasa es annak energiai celra
>valo hasznalas,amig az oxigen az athmosferat ismet gazdagitana.

Mint mar jeleztem, nem erossegem a kemia, de valoszinuleg nem 
tevedek sokat, ha azt allitom, hogy a CO, CO2 kemiai 
elvalasztasakor ugyanannyi energiat kell elhasznalnink, mint 
amennyit a letrehozasukkor (=egetes) nyertunk. Ez azt jelenti 
szamomra, hogy minden kinyert energiat az energiakinyeres 
mellektermekenek megszuntetesere forditunk, a netto 
energiakihozatal nulla (0!!) lesz. Azaz, abbahagyhatjuk az egeszet. 
Mindez persze, csak az osszes energiaatalakitasi lepcso 100% 
hatasfoka mellett igaz. Valos folyamatokban, amelyekben a hatasfok  
<100%, meg netto energiabefektetes is kell ahhoz, hogy ne nyerjunk 
semmit. Bomba uzlet.
Nyilt szivvel, szemmel es fullel varom a tovabbi otleteket.

Apropo, bomba! Laszlo Barna irja:
>Szoval kell, de azert en megsem erzem a technologiat "bombabiztosnak". Es
>ez a kepzettarsitasom nem is olyan profan! Ertheto okokbol a nagyhatalmak
>ragaszkodna(na)k ahhoz, hogy a dolog az o kezukben maradjon. A kisebbek
>meg legalabb annyira ertheto modon yugtalankodnanak, ha a villanykapcsolo
>a hon szeretett es onzetlen nagyobb testver kezeugyeben lenne. 

Nem olyan tragikus a kapcsolo helyzete. Nem tudom, mennyire 
ismered a nalunk is mukodo VVER reaktorokat. Az uzemanyag 
kazettaja hatszogletu, mig a vilagban szinte mindenutt negyzetracsos 
elrendezesu, negyzetalaku kazettakat hasznalnak. Volt is fejvakaras 
a rendszervaltas koruli idokben: mi lesz, ha a nagy testver nem 
szallit nekunk tobbet Ilyet sehol mashol a vilagban nem gyartanak.. 
Illetekeseink meg a szalkat sem huztak ki a kormuk alol, mire mar itt 
volt a BNFL (British Nuclear Fuel Ltd.) ajanlata a gyartasra. Vagyis: 
ha egy orszag nem birtokol atomsorompo egyezmenybe (=NPT, ha 
jol tudom Non Proliferation Treaty) utkozo erzekeny technologiat 
(mint pl. urandusitas), az meg nem jelent kiszolgaltatottsagot. Az a 
nehany orszag, amelyik ezt kereskedelmi szinten birtokolja, nem 
lesz szolidaris egymassal. Persze a proliferation aggodalom - ti. tul 
sokan juthatnak erzekeny technologiakhoz - jogos, kulonosen, ha 
olyan orszagokra gondolunk, mint Irak, Pakisztan, Del-Afrika, Izrael. 

Ami a kiegett uzemanyag tarolast illeti: a felvazolt kep (DK-i 
szomszedaink esetleges taroloirol) valoban nem tul megnyugtato, 
foleg igy kozos tiszai cian es nehezfem partyjaink utan (ti. kozosen 
ittuk e rendkivuli mixelesu koktelokat). Csak az a vigaszunk lehet, 
hogy a Cernavoda atomeromu a Duna also folyasan van.


Üdvözlettel
Gács Iván