In article >,  <""@diamond.nb.net> wrote:
>I searched for "Spanish Chat" and access
>to your page was one of two that came up.  
>	Are we on the right track, & is anything here appropriate?  If not, do
>you have any other suggestions?

I'd say your search hit a bull's eye!  This is just the place for
Spanish chatters.

Noway Jose

In article >,
Johnny  > wrote:
| 
| 
| 
| You unfortunately do not see the woods for a tree. If all that is imputed 
| in your two long posts on Soros were true, than there would be no such 
| thing as financial market. Whoever is the author of these paranoid 
| pamphlets lacks the most basic notion of how the markets work. If an 
| individual could master such an enormous power to move the markets at 
| will, as is ascribed to Soros in these articles, he would already long 
| since command half of the world's output. If Soros is really such a 
| 'smooth operator' there is no need for him to stay in the shadow any 
| longer. He can step out and crown himself Emperor of half the planet.
| Conspiracy theories are the brainchild of frustrated minds. You need a 
| good fuck to chill out and let the steam off, buddy.


Also if it was all true - I would not have to go to work
starting tomorrow. Just follow  his investments, and invest
in his funds... Man.. if it is all true I'm willing to pay
you a cut off the profits I made, since you gave me the tip
on how to get rich  without risk, you're deserving. 
Forrget Soros grants... investing in him pays a lot better..

Istvan

Check it out - a completely FREE! on-line service for the
international community - dating, friendship, marriage.

At: http://www.netdata-intl.com/hearts

Or if you don't have a web browser, get a free registration
form by sending e-mail to "" with
the keyword "info" in the subject of the mail.

You unfortunately do not see the woods for a tree. If all that is imputed 
in your two long posts on Soros were true, than there would be no such 
thing as financial market. Whoever is the author of these paranoid 
pamphlets lacks the most basic notion of how the markets work. If an 
individual could master such an enormous power to move the markets at 
will, as is ascribed to Soros in these articles, he would already long 
since command half of the world's output. If Soros is really such a 
'smooth operator' there is no need for him to stay in the shadow any 
longer. He can step out and crown himself Emperor of half the planet.
Conspiracy theories are the brainchild of frustrated minds. You need a 
good fuck to chill out and let the steam off, buddy.
 Montenegrino

Wally Keeler > wrote:
>Took the words right out of my post
If you are so picky, than let me put it this way: By all means avoid crossing 
my path!
>At any rate my  kis molacs, baroooom! as I hop on my hunka Harley and
>speed down the infobahn to the dataclysm. BARRROOOOOM!
Whatever helps you to accomplish the task, pubi! Have a fun (1-way) trip!

In article >,
willy, the canadian pseudo poet and artificial artist writes:
>However, I do seek approval from what I regard as my peers, who are
>discerning enough to recognize the aesthetic value of my graphemes and
>morphemes aka concrete poetry and conceptual poetry. That you do not agree
>is totally irrelev?nt to me and is insignificant to the body of peers who
>do appreciate the work.

Oh, really? Too bad you got upset cause we called you a pseudo poet -  and the
fact that you actually reply to my posts! Oh, well.

>Well of course you are nice -- you are bland. You are mild whereas I am
>wild. You are simply a dumb chap-lipped cocksucker swallowing the contents
>of large intestines who plays the role of a Knight in Shining Aluminum for
>dried up dumb cunts. No go ahead and play the role Mr Grundy and get
>yourself upset because of the use of foul malodorous language. I'm a rude
>dude. I'm insolent, impudent, irreverent, etc etc. AMEN!

No, you're not rude - you're a hypocrite. Rude would be if you always wrote
like that. Hypocrites, like you and the Brigster, are just too logical to be
rude. You're just too predictable.
By the way, why would I get upset? You're too stupid and obscure to have any
influence on my life. In fact, you and your rubber woman are great for laughs!
Loud music upsets me, but I can't account for your taste.
You idolize me: you called me a friendly vital organ (bland
gland), then a peanut (goober). I know I'm far superior than you, but no need
for your failed flattery, monkey boy. You'll still be my little pseudo poet.

Lo, I wonder why you get off at trying to insult people? What compels you?
Your lack of education? Lack of a brain? Lack of a happy childhood? Need of
approval by other people? Lack of purpose in your life? The only culture you
seem to have is the bacteria between your toes.

>which can be self-consuming. You should post about other things as well a
>posting your thoughts and feelings about MYSELF.

Now, now; no need to get upset that I don't approve of you. Calm down and
rewrite the sentence, since I can't understand it. Take a deep breath and calm
down.

Gabor

> wrote:
>Ki tud felvilgositatst adni a Budapesten kaphato Humet cseppekrol.
>Allitolag van egy Humet szakrendeles a Fehervari uton Xi ker. Fehervari ut

Mire jok ezek a cseppek?

PJ