Hollosi Information eXchange /HIX/
HIX KORNYESZ 368
Copyright (C) HIX
1997-05-22
Új cikk beküldése (a cikk tartalma az író felelőssége)
Megrendelés Lemondás
1 Kedves Kornyesz Olvasok! (mind)  153 sor     (cikkei)

+ - Kedves Kornyesz Olvasok! (mind) VÁLASZ  Feladó: (cikkei)

It tovabbitom ezt a felhivast.  Sajnalom, hogy angolul.

LBT
VMVMVMVMVMVMVMVMVMVMVMVMVMVM


>Dear Colleagues,
>
>The inaugral isssue of Conservation Ecology will appear on the
>Internet at
>
>          http://www.consecol.org
>
>on June 15.  It's contents are briefly summarized below, and I
>particularly draw your attention to the Policy Forum on Science,
>Advocacy, and Policy. The capstone of this forum is an open discussion
>on the internet of a set of materials (Perspective, Commentaries, and
>Young Scholar Dialogue) that will be published in the first
>issue. This is very much an experiment, and I ask your help in
>exploring the opportunity.
>
>The first issue is looking good. A Table of Contents is included at
>the end of this message.  It includes interesting, well written papers
>covering a range of topics and perspectives not commonly seen in
>ecological journals.  They fall into three designated categories:
>
>Synthesis : Papers integrating elements normally considered separately
>in order to suggest new opportunities for theory, policy and/or
>practise - any length but the more succinct the better.
>
>Research: Original research with text limited to 4000 words but any
>number of figures or appendices.
>
>Insight: Singular discoveries, examples, or assessments that suggest
>new directions, clarify old ones, or clarify ideas for an
>interdisciplinary audience - theory, concepts, methods, or practise.
>Length less than 4000 words.
>
>In addition, we have the aforementioned Policy Forum on Advocacy,
>Science and Policy. We want to seed a discussion on the argument that
>well-intentioned advocacy can promulgate bad policy based on
>inadequate science; that the rules for good, experimental,
>reductionist science can produce irrelevant information easily
>misused; that the very culture and methods of science can be exploited
>in disinformation campaigns.
>
>It is comprised of the following:
>
>-a Perspective by Gordon Baskerville, a well known forest systems
>ecologist from Canada who has been at various times a respected
>ecosystem scientist, an innovative Deputy Minister in a Provincial
>Department of Natural Resources, a Dean of Forestry, and an advisor to
>the CEO of a large Forest Industry enterprise. The editorial's
>subtitle could well be "Traditional Ecological Science is Unsafe
>Practice"!.
>
>-Commentaries on the editorial by several senior scholars experienced
>in the issues from perspectives of both science and policy.
>
>-Viewpoints of Young Scholars- a summary of comments triggered by the
>above editorial and the commentaries during a 5-day conversation on
>the internet by 9 young scholars from North America, Europe, and
>Australia. This was organized by and for graduate, post-doctoral
>students, and researchers early in their professional career.
>
>Those three sets of comments will be published simultaneously on June
>15. They will set the stage for the fourth and final element of the
>Policy Forum - a moderated, six-day discussion on the internet open to
>the subscribers and readers of Conservation Ecology.
>
>Would you please make a point to scan the material in the first issue
>and to participate in the open discussion June 25-30? Please, in
>particular, encourage young students and young collegues to be
>involved.
>
>C.S. Holling
>
>Editor-in-Chief
>
>_____________________________________________________________________
>
>CONSERVATION ECOLOGY Volume 1, Issue 1
>
>TABLE OF CONTENTS
>
>Synthesis
>
>1.       Stephen Carpenter and Kathryn Cottingham
>          Resilience and restoration of lakes
>
>2.       Giulio De Leo and Simon Levin
>          The multifaceted aspects of ecosystem integrity
>
>Research
>
>3.       Timothy Keitt
>          Detecting critical scales in fragmented
>          landscapes
>
>4.       Lynn van Coller
>          Automatic techniques for the qualitative
>          assessment of analysis of ecological models:
>          I continuous models
>
>5.       Johan Colding and Carle Folke
>          The relation between threatened species, their
>          protection, and taboos
>
>Insight
>
>6.       Donald Ludwig, Brian Walker, and C.S. Holling
>          Sustanability, stability, and resilience
>
>7.       Alan Anderson
>          Using ants as bioindicators: multi-scale issues in
>          ant community ecology
>
>
>Forum
>Perspective
>
>8.       Gordon Baskerville
>          Advocacy, science, policy, and life in the real
>          world
>
>Commentary
>
>9.        Jerry Franklin - Comments on Dr. Baskerville's Viewpoint
>10.       Koichi Fujii - Comments on Dr. Baskerville's Viewpoint
>11.       Gilberto Gallopin - Comments on Dr. Baskerville's Viewpoint
>12.       Simon Levin - Management and the problem of scale
>13.       Ron Pulliam - Bridging the gap between ecology and
>                              resource management
>14.       Brian Walker - Comments on Dr. Baskerville's Viewpoint
>15.       John Wiens - Scientific responsibility and
>                              responsible ecology
>
>Young Scholar Dialogue
>
>16.     Garry Peterson, Shealagh Pope, Giulio Alessandro De Leo,
>          Marco Janssen, Jay Malcolm, Jennifer Parody, Greg Hood,
>          and Malcolm North
>          Title to be determined
>

Lawrence M. Dill, Professor and Director,
Behavioural Ecology Research Group,
Dept. of Biological Sciences,
Simon Fraser University
Burnaby, B.C. V5A 1S6
CANADA
Phone: 604-291-3664
FAX:  604-291-3496

AGYKONTROLL ALLAT AUTO AZSIA BUDAPEST CODER DOSZ FELVIDEK FILM FILOZOFIA FORUM GURU HANG HIPHOP HIRDETES HIRMONDO HIXDVD HUDOM HUNGARY JATEK KEP KONYHA KONYV KORNYESZ KUKKER KULTURA LINUX MAGELLAN MAHAL MOBIL MOKA MOZAIK NARANCS NARANCS1 NY NYELV OTTHON OTTHONKA PARA RANDI REJTVENY SCM SPORT SZABAD SZALON TANC TIPP TUDOMANY UK UTAZAS UTLEVEL VITA WEBMESTER WINDOWS